The transradial approach (TRA) has gone through significant changes and improvements since it was first described by Dr. Campeau in the late s. TRA has also been proven to be a very suitable method for performing coronary catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as it provides a decrease in access site bleeding1,2 and mortality.3,4 Nonetheless, it is still underutilized in the cardiac interventional community because of some perceived drawbacks that make it unappealing to femorally trained operators.
The major drawback is centered around the learning curve for many interventionists. The higher incidence of anatomical variations seen in the upper limbs and the innominate- arch junction could render coronary angiography and PCI difficult and trickier to perform. Furthermore, the use of smaller-sized equipment (ie, sheaths, catheters) makes TRA unattractive because of a false perception that certain techniques are not feasible. However, these apparent drawbacks can easily be overcome by a trained TRA operator. It is the purpose of this article to review and discuss guiding catheter sizes and shapes to be used for transradial PCI.
Radial artery diameter is of a smaller caliber than the femoral artery (normal diameter of the radial artery lumen is 2.4 mm [range, 1.8–3 mm]), making tool selection and manipulation for TRA entirely different compared to the femoral approach. PCI cases have been previously described using guides as small as 4 F5 and as big as 8 F.6 However, the majority of TRA interventions performed today can be successfully accomplished with 5- or 6-F guiding catheters,7 as all of our current stents can be delivered through these guides for the treatment of simple or even the most complex lesions (ie, bifurcation or chronic total occlusion). Furthermore, bulky equipment, such as rotational atherectomy or intravascular ultrasound, can be performed safely and adequately with these guides. Nonetheless, certain disadvantages can present with smaller-sized guides (Table 1) but usually do not hinder the ability to successfully perform coronary interventions.
For optimal stent delivery, good guide support (also known as backup support) is necessary. Good guide support revolves around the ability of the guide catheter to remain in position and to provide appropriate stability for the advancement of interventional equipment. Two types of backup support exist: passive and active backup. Passive backup usually relies on the property of the shaft and tip to maintain position at the ostium. Support is provided by either the aortic root or valve or by the catheter shape.8 These catheters usually require minimal manipulation and rarely deep-seats the coronary ostium. On the other hand, active backup catheters use the aortic root to accomplish a desired shape and to provide support, which requires a fair amount of active manipulation by the operator to obtain a stable position coaxially. With the transradial approach, active support of the guiding catheter plays a more important role than with the standard femoral approach.
Both active and passive backup support can be achieved with 6-F catheters. With 5-F guiding catheters, active support is required in a number of cases. Catheters ≥ 7 F will provide better passive support at the expense of minimal active support and the inability of deep coronary engagement. Conversely, 5-F catheters provide good active support and are able to be deep-seated into the coronary artery, therefore providing guide “extension” and accordingly provide better support and coaxial alignment during coronary interventions. Furthermore, long Brite Tip catheters (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, NJ), primarily those with longer and softer tips, can also be employed and provide greater safety during deep-seating maneuvers.
A “mother-child” hybrid system has also been proposed as a way to enhance the backup support of 6-F catheters and at the same time permit the use of smaller guide catheters to perform deep intubation maneuvers. Takahashi et al9 first described the five-in-six system in which a 5-F, 120-cm-long guide catheter was inserted into a 6-F, 100-cmlong guide catheter. Subsequently, a four-in-six system was attempted10; this technique revealed superior trackability because of the 4-F child catheter and higher backup support, which ultimately resulted in a higher stenting success rate (> 90%) for lesions in which conventional techniques had been unsuccessful. Another option is the use of the GuideLiner device (Vascular Solutions, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), which also provides additional support with 6-F guiding catheters and is particularly helpful in complex PCIs, such as heavily calcified vessels and distal lesions, tortuous vessels, or chronic total occlusions.11-13
Accessing the Ascending Aorta
In most cases, accessing the ascending aorta via the right or left radial artery is easily done and does not pose any major challenges. In certain cases, this important step could be hampered and is usually a result of an anatomic difficulty. From the left radial approach, the regular 0.035- inch J-wire could preferentially enter the descending aorta; however, this nuisance could be easily corrected with a deep inspiration, with or without a counterclockwise catheter rotation, to re-orient the wire. On the other hand, the right radial approach might provide more difficulty because of the higher incidence of right subclavian artery tortuosity and innominate arch junction distortion. Once again, a deep inspiration could partially help in the unfolding of the tortuosity. Other options include the use of a hydrophilic guidewire (HydroSteer, St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN), as it may slip itself more easily into the ascending aorta.
Guide catheter kinking while maneuvering into the coronary ostia may also occur. Deep inspiration or leaving the J-wire within the catheter to enhance torqueability is usually sufficient to correct this matter. This maneuver, albeit simple, is probably the single most critical one in TRA because it may help in both cannulating the coronary ostia and improving guide catheter support.
Guide Selection for Different Clinical Situations
Guide selection is important because the operator must select a guide that provides good backup support, coaxiality, and stability once the ostium of the artery is intubated. It should be emphasized that most curves designed for the femoral approach are perfectly suited for transradial PCI. In fact, an international survey among radialists revealed that for the left coronary system, extra backup (EBU, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN; or XB, Cordis Corporation) guiding catheters were the most popular, and the JR 4 remained the standard shape for the right coronary artery. Furthermore, for left-sided vein grafts, radial operators prefer Amplatztype guiding catheters and JR 4 or multipurpose guiding catheters for the right-sided vein grafts. It remains controversial whether left TRA better suits these catheters compared to the right radial approach. Overall, radial operators use the right radial approach in 90% of cases, except for post-CABG involving the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) (Figure 1).14 In these cases, cannulation of the LIMA is much easier from the left side, although it remains possible to cannulate the LIMA from the right radial approach.15
Left coronary system. PCI of the left coronary system is usually accomplished with extra-backup catheters (XB or EBU); however, catheter size is usually 0.5 F smaller than what would be used in femoral procedures (3 or 3.5 F vs 3.5 or 4 F, respectively). Engagement into the left main artery is also different from the femoral approach, as the guide is usually cannulated from below the ostium with a counterclockwise movement compared to the more direct and superior cannulation if the femoral route is selected. These catheters provide all of the active support backup from the contralateral aortic wall and offer appropriate deep-seating capability. The Amplatz left catheters (AL 1 or 2 F) provide great passive backup support and are usually the catheters of choice for complex coronary interventions (ie, calcified lesions, chronic total occlusion). Finally, the Judkins left catheters do not usually provide good backup support in TRA and therefore are less frequently utilized; however, they can be useful in the setting of ostial left main stenosis where guide support is not a major concern.
Right coronary system. For noncomplex or ostial lesions, a Judkins right 4-F catheter is adequate for PCI. However, this guide catheter is usually inadequate in the setting of a complex procedure or in the presence of a dilated aortic root because we lose the contralateral aortic wall active support. Furthermore, when the right coronary artery (RCA) arises from an anterior or posterior position, coaxial position is limited, and PCI is usually cumbersome. An Amplatz right (1 or 2) or Amplatz left (0.75 or 1) would be a better selection and would provide better support. However, a judicious ostial approach is always recommended with these catheters to avoid traumatic dissections. It should be noted that the respiration of the patient might induce larger backand- forth displacements of the guiding catheter seated at the ostium of the RCA, and thus, caution should be exercised during PCI, especially with Amplatz guiding catheters.
A range of radially dedicated guide catheters has been produced (Barbeau, Kimney, Fadajet), and they are effective for RCA PCI. The Barbeau is a modified multipurpose catheter with an additional 135º curve at the tip to assist in cannulation. Cannulation of the RCA is usually performed with a clockwise “corkscrew” maneuver while coming from above the ostium. In certain instances, an inferior approach is appropriate and is done by pushing down on the catheter, forcing the tip to bend up toward the RCA. The Barbeau also has excellent malleability and permits guide “Amplatzing” (ie, when you modify the form of a catheter into one that resembles an Amplatz catheter) and very deep coronary intubation (Figure 2).
The Kimney catheter has a 45º primary curve with a secondary curve of 90º that allows it to support itself on the contralateral aortic wall. It is common to cannulate the left coronary artery from below with this catheter while coming from a horizontal or superior position to cannulate the right. Both of these catheters provide good backup support and enable coronary intubation during PCI, especially in very tortuous arteries (ie, shepherd's hook RCA). It should be noted that these shapes designed by radial pioneers remain less frequently used than traditionally shaped guiding catheters. An exception to this statement is the left and right Ikari curve, specifically designed by Terumo Interventional Systems, Inc. (Somerset, NJ) for transradial PCI. Compared to Judkins-type guiding catheters, the Ikari curves provide more support.8 Unfortunately, they have not yet been compared to EBU- or XB-type curves.
LIMA grafts. LIMAs are best approached via left TRA with a modified or nonmodified mammary catheter. Conversely, cannulation of the right internal mammary arteries is usually attempted via the right TRA and is usually harder to achieve because the ostium takeoff is at 90º to the catheter plane. Reshaping of the mammary catheter tip in the subclavian or innominate artery, by bending and collapsing the tip on itself, might provide some aid. The other possibility is to use a percutaneous guidewire (ie, balanced middle-weight [BMW], Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) to cannulate the right internal mammary artery and, thereafter, track the catheter over it.
The majority of PCIs can be performed using 6-F guiding catheters, and 5-F guiding catheters remain particularly attractive because catheter-radial artery mismatch increases the risks of postcatheterization radial artery occlusion. Although some dedicated radial shapes have been developed, most radial operators use standardshaped guide catheters. Apart from operator preferences, further studies will be required to determine whether universal radial catheters may offer some benefits compared to standard shapes in terms of duration of procedures, radiation exposure, and contrast volume.
Jimmy MacHaalany, MD, is with the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. He stated that he has no financial interests related to this article.
Eltigani Abdelaal, MD, is with the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. He stated that he has no financial interests related to this article.
Olivier F. Bertrand, MD, PhD, is with the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. He stated that he has no financial interests related to this article. Dr. Bertrand may be reached at (418) 656-; .
Received date: 08-Nov-, Manuscript No. FMIC-23-; Editor assigned: 10-Nov-, PreQC No. FMIC-23- (PQ); Reviewed date: 24-Nov-, QC No. FMIC-23-; Revised date: 01-Dec-, Manuscript No. FMIC-23- (R); Published date: 08-Dec-, DOI: 10./- ..15(S20).492
Interventional cardiology is an increasingly complex field, with new techniques and corresponding advances in equipment occurring annually. Keeping abreast of the expansive number of tools available can be daunting. A fundamental knowledge regarding the basic equipment that is employed in routine Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) cases is important for practitioners of interventional cardiology, as well as candidates for the interventional cardiology boards exams. Guide catheters share function with diagnostic coronary catheters, with many additional design features to facilitate smooth delivery of interventional devices. Appropriate choice of the guide catheter in a coronary case can be accomplished with attention to details of the diagnostic angiogram and fitment of the diagnostic catheter. Coronary guidewires are used to cross the coronary lesion, deliver devices, and, at times, navigate highly complex coronary anatomy. Guidewires are available with specialized characteristics altering cross-ability, track-ability, and device deliverability. Angioplasty balloons are also variable in design, and the choice of balloon often involves compromise of deliverability, lesion cross-ability, and compliance. In contemporary PCI practice, balloons are commonly used to pre and post-dilate lesions to be stented, as well as to deploy the stent itself. In this review, we examine guide catheters, coronary guidewires, and angioplasty balloons; as well as the basic evidence-based approach in PCI case. Appropriate choice and utilization of PCI equipment will improve procedural efficiency and safety. Awareness of the capabilities and, just as importantly, the limitations of our equipment will help us to improve patient care and outcomes on a day-to-day basis.
Guide catheters • Coronary guidewires • Angioplasty balloons; Percutaneous coronary intervention • Boards review
Coronary guides function similarly to diagnostic catheters, simultaneously allowing for angiography and pressure transduction, with additional engineering to facilitate delivery of interventional equipment. Guides are traditionally 3 layers; an outer nylon layer allowing for atraumatic delivery in the body, a middle layer of stainless-steel mesh providing structure and support, and an inner hydrophilic Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coated layer to allow for smooth passage of devices [1]. Guides typically have thinner walls than diagnostic catheters, a larger inner lumen, and higher rigidity; the outer 2 layers can also be combined to increase lumen size. Guides are more likely to obstruct the cannulated vessel due to lack of tapered tip. The guide catheter sizing in “French” describes the outer diameter in millimeters multiplied by 3 (2 mm OD=6 French). Conversely, the sheath size describes the inner diameter of sheath. Commonly, guide needs to be 2F size bigger than a comparable sheath to deliver a device, for example in carotid or renal stenting procedure, one can typically utilize a 6F sheath but would need an 8F guide to deliver the stent. “Passive” support refers to the degree of support provided by the basic guide shape and counter-force from opposing structure (aorta, sinus of Valsalva), while “active” support is achieved by advancement and pressure on the guide by the operator [2].
An ideal guide for a particular intervention balances coaxial fit, backup support, adequate lumen to deliver the necessary device, and lowest profile to prevent access complication and/or coronary hypoperfusion. Each of these may not be possible for a given case, and careful review of anatomy and potential challenges in a case informs guide choice. Attention to the fit of your previous diagnostic catheter can be helpful here as well. A good rule of thumb is to reduce curve length by 0.5 cm compared to the diagnostic catheter i.e., a JL4 diagnostic catheter may be well served by an EBU 3.5 or XB 3.5 guide. Workhorse guides are typically 6F, which allow for passage of up to 2 balloons simultaneously or even 1 balloon and 1 stent, and up to a 1.5 mm rotational atherectomy burr (although in the author’s experience 7F can allow for smoother passage). Procedural complexity should also influence the decision to choose a larger 7 or 8 F guide, including Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO), left main disease, bifurcation, planned atherectomy, calcification, and tortuosity of the vessel. It is beneficial in terms of procedural duration, contrast usage, and prevention of complication, to anticipate procedural complexities and choose appropriate equipment at the outset rather than partway through a case that is going “off the rails”. It is also important to be aware of the effect of guide size on coronary perfusion. For instance, an 8F guide may create a defacto stenosis of>75% of the cannulated vessel, a 7F~60%, and 6F~40%, without much augmentation of flow from side holes [3]. There is in fact a mortality signal with use of larger guides [4].
Once in place, note coaxial fit of the catheter that has been selected, and change immediately if roofing on the artery, diving deeply, decannulating with patient respiration, etc. Note dampening of the pressure and recognize this as a warning sign for potential ischemia during case as well as hydrostatic dissection. Consider changing to a smaller caliber or adding side holes. A “roofed” and/or non-coaxial guide can increase risk of stent dislodgement upon removal of a “no-cross” as well. The Right Coronary Artery (RCA) is particularly prone to dissection by the guide, which happens with deep diving of an aggressive shape or “sucking in” of the catheter tip while balloons (often stent balloons) are being withdrawn hence ensure the guide tip is coaxial and in direct view as you remove any device. Counteract any diving motion by applying traction on the guide with the left hand as you remove devices, using a staccato pulling motion on the balloon.
Radial access has the clear advantage for prevention of access site complication and is the default approach for many operators. In a meta-analysis of PCI, radial access was found to reduce the risk of access site complications by about 10-fold, from 2.8% to 0.3% [5]. In acute coronary syndrome, radial access has been shown to reduce mortality as well [6]. Nonetheless, it is also important to recognize coronary anatomy that may be better served from a groin approach as it pertains to guide support, guide stability (such as ostial lesions), and upsizing. In the case of aorto-ostial coronary lesions, visible coronary calcium, tortuous vessels, and CTO cases, strongly consider transitioning these cases to femoral. In excessive chest wall movement (which can occur in pulmonary patients), femoral can also provide more stability. In extreme iliac tortuosity, guide catheter manipulation can become quite difficult–this can be overcome by using a longer, braided sheath (such as Arrow by Teleflex), and even potentially upsizing.
Choosing the guide catheter
Left sided lesions: Extra-Backup type guides (EBU, XB, Voda, Q-curve) all provide support off contralateral aortic wall, and should generally be the first choice for left lesions. Judkins guides often provide coaxial/ atraumatic fitment but notoriously poor delivery support as the case progresses.
To cannulate the left-sided guide catheter:
• Advance the atraumatic table wire to the left coronary sinus, always leading the guide catheter with the wire and monitoring for proximity to the coronaries. The image intensifier should be in slight LAO position 15-20 degrees.
• Mindfully deliver the guide catheter the left sinus over the wire, then remove the wire. Attaining the left sinus is especially important from the radial position.
• The guided is actively aspirated with a syringe to remove 2 mL-4 mL of blood and attached to the manifold or power injector to allow for pressure transduction and test injections.
• To cannulate the vessel, the catheter is usually slightly withdrawn with counter-clockwise torque, then re-advanced toward the left main. Instructing the patient to inspire can bring the aorta down and facilitate engagement as well.
• High take off left main can sometimes be cannulated by advancing the guide to “ride” up the left sinus until it “pops” into left main, and subsequently pulling back on catheter to achieve coaxial position.
• If a catheter is repetitively “roofing” on the vessel, it is likely undersized. If the tip continually sits below the vessel, it is likely oversized. Change to an appropriately sized catheter up front to facilitate a smoother PCI procedure.
From the radial approach, extra-backup guides provide lesser degree of support, because a shorter portion of the catheter is abutting the vertical aortic wall [7]. Nevertheless, EBU 3.75, EBU 4.0, JCL 3.5-4.0, Ikari left can work well. A C-shaped (JCL) guide from the radial approach balances coaxial shape, moderate backup, and less proclivity for deep-diving. Always remove these highly curved catheters over the J-wire to avoid shearing of aortic plaques and potential for embolism. The highest degree of support can be achieved (from either radial or femoral approach) with appropriately sized Amplatz-Left (AL) guides, as passive support is provided by both the contralateral aortic wall as well as the non-coronary sinus. AL guides are commonly employed in CTO intervention in 7 or 8 F size-in a standard root this would be sized as AL-2. A Judkins-Left (JL) 3.5 or 4.0 guide can be considered in aorto-ostial left main disease, straightforward non-calcified lesions, or if a longer catheter is selectively engaging Left-Anterior Descending (LAD) or Circumflex (Cx). Guide extensions have utility to improve backup support as well.
Right sided lesions: The Judkins-Right 4 (JR4) is the workhorse RCA guide in straightforward cases with horizontal takeoff of the vessel, from both the femoral and radial approach. Radial Tig guides work quite well and can be helpful in a STEMI scenario, as the left-sided angiogram can be done with the same catheter. Given the heightened risk for dissection in the RCA with more aggressive guide shapes, the choice to ramp-up to another guide must not be taken lightly. If higher level of support necessary, a less traumatic choice can be an Ikari LEFT which provides moderate backup. Ikari RIGHT can dive exceptionally deep, and if non-coaxial create prohibitive dissection risk. Otherwise, Amplatz LEFT shapes (AL 0.75 or AL1), and Right Back-Up (RBU) provide the most substantial RCA backup, often used with side holes. Anterior and/or high takeoff RCA can be approached with Amplatz right or left shapes. Upgoing RCA can be approached with AL shape, Internal Mammary (IMA), Williams/ 3DRC, Hockey stick (HS), and Amplatz modified right. Downgoing RCA once again AL shape, AR, Right Coronary Bypass (RCB), Multi-Purpose (MP), and Hockey Stick (HS) [8].
To cannulate the right-sided guide catheter:
• Advance the atraumatic table wire to the right coronary sinus, always leading the guide catheter and monitoring for proximity to the coronaries. The image intensifier should be in the LAO position, 20-25 degrees.
• Mindfully deliver the guide catheter to the right sinus over the wire, then remove the wire..
• The guided is actively aspirated with a syringe to remove 2-4 mL of blood and attached to the manifold or power injector to allow for pressure transduction and test injections.
• To cannulate the vessel, the catheter is usually torqued clockwise to direct towards the RCA ostium to engage.
• Small “in-and-out” movements of the catheter can transmit torque to the guide tip.
• If the catheter is pointing slightly above or below the vessel, remove some but not all of the torque and correct the position before retouring into place.
• For ease and efficiency, the coronary guidewire should already be within the guide and immediately advanced into proximal RCA once the guide is cannulated.
The RCA shepherd’s crook and sigmoid variants need to be given their due course: These are not easily approached from the radial access. Tortuous RCA vessels can create difficulty wiring, difficulty in advancement of devices, and vessel straightening can create pseudolesion and/or reduction in coronary flow. Shepherd’s crook has association with procedural complication. AL1 will offer the best support [9]. Commonly stocked guides that can be employed included AL1, AR1, HS, IMA. If you have taken up a JR4 and recognize a “crook” or sigmoid vessel, replace it before proceeding with the case as shown in the Figures 1 and 2. Wiring of these vessels should be done very slowly and cautiously with use of coil- tipped/atraumatic wires.
Anomalous variants: For a circumflex from right cusp (a very common variant) consider multipurpose, AL-1/AL 0.75, AR1, or HS. Usually this variant is somewhat downgoing and can be cannulated with counter-clockwise torque and advancement, similar as a right coronary vein graft. In separate circumflex/LAD ostia (no left main) or short left main, torque clockwise for Cx and use longer tipped catheters such as extra-backup shape or Amplatz shapes. Torque counterclockwise for LAD and use a shorter tip such as Judkins or Tig. Counterclock and pushing forward can sometimes redirect a catheter from the Cx into LAD. In the case of RCA from left cusp, consider JL3.5 or AL guides.
Cannulation of coronary bypass grafts
Left-sided vein grafts come off aorta anterior, and can be most easily and quickly cannulated in an RAO view:
• Commonly used shapes Judkins right catheter, Amplatz right, Left Coronary Bypass (LCB), and Amplatz left shapes.
• The tip of the catheter is positioned towards the right of the screen in the RAO view.
• Slight in-and-out movements along whilst simultaneous torquing of the guide will allow it to “catch” the ostium of the graft.
• If the graft cannot cannulated at first, incrementally torquing the guide (such as between 1 and 5 o’clock) and repeating slight in-and-out movements is usually successful. If the tip is not reaching the ostium due to the size of the aorta, AL guides will often be the solution.
• Be aware that the surgeon will usually attach the grafts vertically and/or horizontally adjacent to the others.
• If the graft is arched or upgoing, or disease is complex, AL guides (and even potentially upsizing to a larger French size) are advisable. The technique is to form the AL shape to point upward at the root and withdraw to ostium of graft.
Right-sided grafts typically come off aorta right, and are usually cannulated in the LAO view:
Goto Hainwise to know more.
• Judkins right catheters can be used, especially if initial course of the vessel is horizontal.
• If primarily downgoing (which is usually the case), multipurpose guide offers coaxial shape and potential for deep-seating techniques if necessary. Right Coronary Bypass can also be used (RCB).
• The catheter is delivered to the zone above the RCA ostium and rotated with counter-clockwise torque, with small in and out movement, and contrast injection.
• Having a coronary wire within the guide can be helpful to rapidly engage the graft once the guide catches the ostium.
Internal mammary grafts are usually approached with specific IMA guide, although JR4 and LCB can be used. LIMA is cannulated in shallow 10 degrees RAO view. The catheter is delivered over an 0.035” wire distal to the IMA, and slowly pulled back with slight counter-clockwise torque and contrast tests, until it drops into place. Rarely, a coronary wire can be used as a rail to enter LIMA ostium. If the lesion in question is at distal aspect of LAD, a 90 cm guide may be necessary to deliver balloon catheters to lesion.
Guide catheter extension: Simplification of the mother/ daughter technique is achieved using guide catheter extension such as GuideLiner (Vascular Solutions Maple Grove, MN) or Guidezilla (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) and similar products. These devices can enhance support of a standard guide during the case to deliver devices distally, although are not without some safety concerns. It is good practice to attempt use of at least a buddy wire prior to proceeding with a guide extension given lesser cost and risk. Concerns with the extension catheters include coronary dissection and stent deformation, which occurred in 3.3% and 2.2% of cases, respectively, in one series [10]. In a review of 65 voluntarily reported adverse events to the FDA MAUDE database, issues attributed to GuideLiner included catheter fracture (58%), damage to PCI devices (23%), dissection (14%), perforation (3%), and thrombus (1.5%); with an even higher number of complications overall (408) reported with the Guidezilla [11].
To employ these devices, an appropriately sized extension catheter (from 5F to 8F) is advanced over the previously placed guidewire just to the tip of the guide, followed by a balloon suitable to the target lesion. Injection pressures should be reduced once the catheter is in place to avoid hydrostatic dissection. The balloon is then advanced to the target lesion and inflated. The catheter must be advanced over an inflated balloon to mitigate risk for dissection. If binding proximal to desired position, the extender can be “inch-wormed” over a deflating balloon as it advanced step-wise though the vessel. The extender is gradually withdrawn as the operator works more proximally. Be extremely vigilant on withdrawal of undelivered stents though an extension catheter, as there is substantial risk of dislodging the stent.
Coronary guidewires
The standard diameter of a coronary wire is 0.014”, the standard length is 190 cm the distal 20-30 mm of which is radiopaque, whilst 300 cm is the “long” version. There are 3 basic components to a coronary guidewire; the core which provides the backbone of the wire, the shapeable tip, and outer coating [12]. The core is variably made of stainless steel which is more rigid and tends to transfer torque, or nitinol alloy which is more flexible and less likely to kink, but reduces transmission of movement. The more distal the core extends (i.e., core-to-tip), and the larger diameter of the core, the more pushable and torque responsive the wire will be; while smaller core diameter and/or use of tapering offers better flexion. The outer coating is commonly hydrophilic, becoming slippery on exposure to blood, improving trackability and “seeking” of channels as well as penetration of thrombus are shown in the Figure 3. Several basic categories exist including workhorse (routine) wires, support wires, and specialty wires (typically CTO). It is not necessary to have exhaustive knowledge of all products available, though familiarity of the basic categories and facility with wires within each type is essential. Wires differ in support, tip rigidity, steerability, trackability, and lubricity. Ultimately the operator will develop his or her preferences.
• Workhorse wires are usually medium body with the core stopping short of the tip, and typically have a radiopaque metal shaping ribbon comprised of a spring coil (steel, platinum, or tungsten) allowing for ease of tracking through the vessel and high level of safety at the distal vessel. These wires are best for straightforward interventions. Workhorse wires may have a silicone coating.
• Specialty CTO wires may lack the distal coil portion, instead employing a hydrophilic jacket (such as PTFE or any number of proprietary polymers) over the distal tapering core with variable tip loads. The hydrophilic coating attracts water on exposure blood creating a lubricious surface for improved trackability in tortuosity and entry of small channels or thrombus. This occurs at the expense of higher risk of perforation.
• Support wires are heavy body wires that tend to have steel cores allowing for extra stiff shafts to enhance balloon and/ or stent deliverability as shown in the Table 1. It is good practice to exchange support wires through delivery catheters or over the wire balloon after wiring with a more forgiving device. Straightening of vessels can lead to “accordion effect” or pseudolesion, which can impede flow and visualization. On the boards (and in practice), withdraw the wire until the floppy distal portion sits within the lesion, administer nitroglycerin, and reassess.
Table 1: Classification and characteristics of commonly used coronary guidewires.
Coronary angioplasty balloons
Angioplasty balloons in current practice are more commonly used to pre or post-dilate lesions to facilitate stenting as opposed to stand-alone “plain old balloon angioplasty” (POBA). Modern balloons are comprised of a metal hypotube shaft with a channel for the guidewire and a channel for hydrostatic inflation with saline/ contrast. The balloon is advanced over a previously positioned guidewire. If the guidewire channel runs the length of the catheter, the system is considered “Over The Wire” (OTW); and if the wire only runs the distal portion, the system is considered Rapid exchange (RX). Rapid exchange is far more commonly employed. Over the wire balloons can be lower profile, and allow for exchanging of wires at or beyond a lesion, which is often desirable in CTO work. “Nominal” inflation size indicates the diameter achieved when a balloon is inflated to recommended pressure without external forces. Most balloons have two marker dots, one at each end of the inflated portion. Smaller devices ≤ 1.5 mm may have a single marker.
The balloon material itself can be nylon, Polyolefin Copolymer (POC), and Polyethylene Terepthalate (PET) which has increased strength and higher resistance to stretch, making PET useful for noncompliant balloons [13]. Specifically, a compliant (commonly nylon or POC) balloon will have up to 20% size increase from nominal size with supranominal inflation. They are lower profile, flexible, and easy to deliver. Compliant balloons tend to “grow” outside of a resistant zone of lesion in areas of less resistance, which can damage adjacent tissue, cause dissection, or even restenosis in ballooned areas. This is also described as “dog-boning”. Noncompliant balloons (commonly PET) allow for
Logistically, when performing POBA, a successful result is considered1.1:1.0) appears to reduce acute complications including perforation and dissection [15]. POBA is often performed in the range of minutes as opposed to seconds. Vessel spasm can be treated with bolus dosing of intracoronary nitroglycerin at doses of 100-500 mcg. Adherent thrombus can be managed with intracoronary or peripherally administered GPI medications (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofban), or use of aspiration thrombectomy catheters. Acute vessel recoil is considered a major limitation of POBA, and when severe is treated with stenting (this was the original function for bare metal devices). Dissection is most commonly also treated with stenting although there has historically been a role for the GPI medications to prevent thrombosis [16]. Angiographic reassessment after several minutes may be useful to assess for acute recoil or closure.
The mechanism of Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) is compression and fracturing of plaque, stretching of adventitia, and intimal tearing which universally occurs but may or may not be visible angiographically. Similar to PCI with stenting, an inflammatory reaction occurs at sites of PTCA which ultimately results in proliferation of smooth muscle and extracellular matrix. Unlike stenting, there is also contraction of the external elastic lamina that occurs that accounts for>60% of the lumenal loss (“negative remodelling”) [17]. The Achilles heel of POBA is restenosis which occurs at a rate of 40%-60% at 6 months [18]; clinical target lesion is revascularization is also quite high at~20% at 1 year which is reduced by stenting and even further with drug eluting stent [19-21].
When deciding to pre-dilate a lesion before stenting, one considers procedural duration, cost, safety, and efficiency. If attempting to directly pass a stent through difficult vessel anatomy or into a complex lesion, it is inefficient if not outright risky to do so if the stent proves to no-cross. Part and parcel with stent removal is the risk for stent dislodgement within the vessel or at the guide. It is also extremely undesirable to deploy stent at a lesion that does not yield to ballooning, so-called “stent regret”, as options to rectify a suboptimally deployed stent are limited. Lesions favorable for direct stenting include soft plaque, proximal lesions, short lesions, vein grafts, and in ACS cases to exclude adhering thrombus. Lesions likely to benefit from pre-dilatation are visibly calcified lesions (to ensure full expansion and stent delivery), long lesions (to ensure proper stent length), distal lesions, and critical lesions (to allow proper angiography during stent placement). Pre-dilatation should be done with conservative sizing and pressure, with the balloon commonly sized at 0.9:1 to the reference vessel.
Cutting/scoring Balloons (CB) employ atherotome blades or wires affixed to the balloon to improve focal force and reduce slippage of the balloon in restenotic or ostial lesions, and potentially reduce dissection from barotrauma. With the added material, the crossing profile is much higher than a standard balloon and rivals that of a stent-perhaps worse than later generation stents. A good rule of thumb is that if a cutting balloon will cross, so will a stent.
There is no benefit in terms of clinical or angiographic outcomes for stand-alone CB compared with POBA for treatment of atherosclerotic CAD, or for treatment of in-stent restenosis; with a signal to disadvantage for risk of perforation [22-24]. In the case of in-stent restenosis, there may be a slight benefit for CB over POBA before restenting to reduce risk of future ISR [24]. For ostial lesions, there also may be a slight benefit to improve acute gain and lessen subsequent restenosis for ostial lesions based on small trials [25,26]. The PCI guidelines support use of CB for ostial lesions or ISR as a measure to avoid trauma to the vessel with balloon “seeding” (Class IIb) but not for routine use (Class III no benefit) [27]. Cutting balloons may also be logistically beneficial in otherwise undilatable or moderately calcified lesions. The ROTA- CUT trial showed improved lumenal gain with use of CB after rotational atherectomy [28].
Performing a basic coronary intervention
Based on the features of the available equipment as described, and operator experience with each, several decisions are made immediately in a given PCI case as part of a methodical approach: access site, anticoagulation, guide shape and size, wire choice, pre-dilatation, calcium modification, stent type and size, adjunct imaging, post-dilatation, and side branch management. Clever management of these variables will help the case to go smoothly and quickly, and the operator will find that his or her choices will seem to become increasingly clever over time.
Access site is chosen based on previously described considerations, with the femoral approach typically reserved only for more technically involved cases. Anticoagulation must be given before a wire hits the target vessel, which can be tailored to access; such that bivalirudin can be considered in femoral cases to attenuate bleeding concerns [29], and heparin preferable for radial access cases given lack of bleeding benefit from this approach [30]. The guide shape and caliber will be selected based on the degree of difficulty one expects based on angiographic findings, and what devices will likely need to be delivered. Guide fitment and position is continuously monitored based on the pressure waveform, and also visually during insertion and removal of devices, to avoid dissection. The coronary wire in a routine case is selected based on proximity of the lesion, tortuosity and calcification of the vessel, presence/ absence of thrombus. The wire is steered gently into position with free movement of the wire tip never passed with force. If wire debacle is identified, the wire must be withdrawn and redirected, allowed to “find its way”.
Pre-dilatation as a routine measure, while adding small amount of time and cost to the case, can help to size stent and ensure vessel yielding before stent passage. Balloon inflation pressure should be the minimum amount necessary for full expansion. Drug-eluting stenting is considered the gold standard and typically follows pre- dilatation. Stents should be generously sized for length to avoid requirement for another device, as this adds cost and also risk for future restenosis. Stents should be deployed to high pressure at least 16 atm as a starting point. Consideration should be given to a prolonged inflation with consistent maintenance of pressure with the indeflator to allow for full vessel expansion and improved stent apposition [31,32].
When balloons are being removed, remember that the counterforce acts to “suck” the guide catheter into the ostium, which has to be balanced by consistent back pressure on the guide with the left hand, especially when withdrawing balloons from freshly deployed long stents or rigid vessels. This is a very common cause of vessel dissection. The balloon should be allowed to fully deflate before removal. It is advantageous to keep the guide catheter tip in view while the balloon is being freed from the lesion using a staccato tugging maneuver. One can also employ a forward push first, akin to freeing one’s fingers from a finger trap.
When deploying a stent, it is worthwhile to be aware that under deployed stents become restenotic stents, and severely under deployed or malapposed stents can become thrombosed stents down the line. The goal minimal stent diameter (MSD) is typically>5.0 mm2 for a DES and>6.5 mm2 for BMS to ensure future vessel patency, and therefore IVUS can be considered to optimize stent deployment as well [33]. If a vessel is calcified angiographically, or by IVUS (which is widely considered more accurate in determination of vessel calcium), calcium management should be employed before stenting. This may include noncompliant ballooning, cutting balloon (up to moderate calcium), and lithotripsy or atherectomy (severe calcium). If a stent is not expanding fully due to vessel rigidity, options can include inflation of post balloon until burst (grenadoplasty), ultra-high-pressure ballooning such as with Chocolate balloon (Medtronic Minneapolis, MN), and lithotripsy with Shockwave (Shockwave Medical Santa Clara, CA). Use of laser with contrast or blood medium is described [34], but in the author’s experience is not particularly effective.
Post-dilation of stents should be done as a general rule, with a non-compliant balloon~0.25 mm larger than the stent and shorter than the stent length [35]. This is especially true for longer lesions, overlapping stents, and smaller vessels. The realities of stent underexpansion with the stent balloon are somewhat sobering– based on the POST-IT IVUS based study,>70% of stents were suboptimally deployed with the stent balloon alone in that the MSD was at least 10% less than the averaged vessel area. Post- dilatation essentially doubled optimum stent deployment and significantly increased MSD [36]. In the STOP study, only 21% of stents achieved optimized deployment at 16 atm (i.e. MSD achieved was>60% distal reference vessel), which increased to 54% with going to 20 atm [37]. In a large registry of>90,000 patients, low pressure20 atm stent deployment were both associated with ISR and stent thrombosis [38]. In smaller vessels, or longer lesions with tapering length, the stent should be sized to the distal reference and deployed to moderate pressure (10 atm-14 atm) to avoid distal vessel injury, followed by higher pressure post-dilation on the proximal aspect. Always reassess with at least 2 orthogonal views, and with the wire withdrawn, to assess whether any proximal or distal complication has occurred. Liberalized use of nitroglycerin can help discern spasm vs. true lesion, and will save placement of further devices.
Bifurcation lesions should be approached as possible with a single stent technique, given failure of multiple trials to demonstrate any clinically important advantage to up front multi-stent techniques [39]. It is good practice to at least place a wire in the Side Branch (SB) to allow for a measure of protection against plaque shift and mark the position of the branch as well [40]. After main vessel stenting, provisional ballooning of the SB, followed by provisional T-stenting only as necessary, is practical and efficient. Proximal Optimization Technique (POT) should be done to ensure proximal apposition and facilitate SB re-wiring, and repeated if any ballooning has been done through the stent struts to reappose struts (POT/ SB/ Re-POT) as shown in the Figure 4. POT/SB/Re- POT achieves better vessel circularity than kissing balloon [41].
This simple technique was also associated with reduction in target lesion failure (4% vs. 6%) and stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.3%) when compared with no POT in a large bifurcation registry [42].
Failure to pass a stent
This is encountered routinely and is “bread-and-butter” interventional cardiology. It is important to anticipate this issue and pro-actively employ strategies to avoid it. It is also important to have a plan of attack if this is encountered during the case. Reasons that a stent may fail to cross include rigidity of the vessel, tightness of the lesion, tortuosity of the vessel, redundancy of the vessel (as in the case of a “sigmoid” RCA), poor guide support, poor wire support, and stent biasing against the vessel wall or previous stent. Calcium is a major challenge in these situations and may need to be specifically dealt with. Reflex approaches when a calcified and/or tortuous vessel is being treated include upsizing to 7F and/or coming from the groin, use of supportive guides, further lesion prep with pre-dilatation, and use of buddy wires. Guide extension catheters have also become quite commonplace.
Techniques to employ when unable to deliver a stent to the target lesion
Tactics to deliver a stent:
• Anticipate based on lesion characteristics.
• Use groin approach and/or 7F if calcified or tortuous.
• Use guide catheters with passive support.
• Deep seat guide or have assistant apply forward pressure.
• Use long sheath to support the guide.
• Deep breath to straighten segment of vessel.
• Buddy wire with a delivery wire.
• Try both wires before next maneuver.
• Predicate with noncompliant ballon.
• Predicate zone proximal to lesion if necessary.
• Steady forward pressure.
• Rapid bursts of forward pressure.
• Guide extension catheter over inflated ballon.
• Shorten the stent to reduce biasing.
• Change to lower profile or more flexible stent.
• Apply rotaglide to stent to improve tracking.
• Buddy ballon to trap wire distal to lesion, or inflated in a proximal side branch.
• Buddy wire “in jail” by trapping buddy with a stent more proximally.
• Wiggle wire to reduce biasing.
• Rotational or orbital atherectomy to smooth vessel course.
• Accept PTCA result (recall~20% clinical failure).
Failure to pass a balloon: This is encountered much less frequently than failure to pass a stent and is a challenging situation indeed, most often in severely calcified lesions, CTOs, or through stent struts. Many of the same tactics used to beef up delivery equipment also apply [43]. One is uniquely challenged in that the lesion has already been crossed with a wire that presumably cannot be exchanged, unless a balloon or microcatheter can be passed, which is begging the question. A very low-profile balloon such as Sapphire balloon (Teleflex, NC) should be tried, which has sizes down to 1 mm. If a buddy wire can be passed, inflation of a balloon over one of the wires at the proximal aspect of the lesion may exert pressure on the second wire to “pry” into the cap. A balloon can be advanced as far as possible and inflated until rupture to allow for hydrostatic modification of the lesion (grenadoplasty). Conversely, a balloon sized to the vessel proximal to the lesion can be inflated to crack the cap. A CTO microcatheter can be tried to cross the lesion to allow for exchange of a wire with more body. Finally, if suitable wire can be delivered, laser or rotational atherectomy can be employed.
In summary, working knowledge of day-to-day coronary equipment is important for the interventional cardiologist to improve procedural efficiency and outcomes. Exhaustive knowledge of all available equipment is neither necessary nor practical, as the operator becomes familiar and proficient with a smaller array of guides, wires, balloons, etc. that work best in his or her hands. A standard approach for PCI can be employed in the majority of routine cases, and hopefully can serve as a starting point for cases that prove to be more complex. In all cases, PCI must be approached methodically. One learns to control the variables that can be controlled such as access, anticoagulation, the nature of the equipment, the use calcium modification and/or adjunct imaging, and simple measures such as post-dilatation. As experience grows, the operator will find that his or her choices will seem to become increasingly clever over time. Importantly, there will also be variables that cannot be controlled. Therefore, the interventionist must always anticipate possible challenges and complications, and mindfully employ tools techniques and tools from the outset to improve procedural and clinical outcomes.
Want more information on PTCA Guidewire? Feel free to contact us.